伪攻角三回路自动驾驶仪极点配置策略对比
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparison of Pole Placement Strategies for Pseudo Angle of Attack Three Loop Autopilot
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为解决自动驾驶仪设计时,极点选取过分依赖工程经验的问题,提出3种极点配置策略。在考虑开环截止频率约束极点配置方法的基础上,进一步推导3种不同极点配置策略下自动驾驶仪各参数的解析表达式,并分析每个策略各自的优缺点。通过2个不同特性的设计实例,对3种策略下的自动驾驶仪响应特性进行对比分析。结果表明:3种方法均能保证足够的稳定裕度,ITAE法则响应速度最快,但具有超调和一次振荡;实极点为主导极点的准则可以做到阶跃响应无超调;共圆准则下的相角裕度最大。

    Abstract:

    In order to solve the problem that the selection of poles depends too much on engineering experience in the design of autopilot, three pole-placement strategies are proposed. Based on the pole assignment method considering the open-loop cut-off frequency constraint, the analytical expressions of the autopilot parameters under three different pole assignment strategies are derived, and the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy are analyzed. The autopilot response characteristics under three strategies are compared and analyzed through two design examples with different characteristics. The results show that all the three methods can ensure enough stability margin, and the ITAE rule has the fastest response speed, but it has overshoot and single oscillation. The rule with the real pole as the dominant pole can achieve no overshoot in the step response. The phase angle margin is the largest under the concircular rule.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孔 哲.伪攻角三回路自动驾驶仪极点配置策略对比[J].,2026,45(03).

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-11
  • 最后修改日期:2024-12-20
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-03-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码